Re: Type Level "Application" Operator

+1! Readability improvements are wonderful. On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 11:31 PM, Jon Purdy wrote:

+1 from me, if only as a nice-to-have—it would be good to flesh out some standard type operators in general.

On Nov 1, 2016 4:14 PM, "Elliot Cameron" wrote:

...

Folks,

Has there been a discussion about adding a type-level operator "$" that just mimics "$" at the value level?

type f $ x = f x infixr 0 $

Things like monad transformer stacks would look more "stack-like" with this:

type App = ExceptT Err $ ReaderT Config $ LogT Text IO

Elliot Cameron

_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries

_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries

-- Jeff Brown | Jeffrey Benjamin Brown Website https://msu.edu/~brown202/ | Facebook https://www.facebook.com/mejeff.younotjeff | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffreybenjaminbrown(I often miss messages here) | Github https://github.com/jeffreybenjaminbrown