On 10/16/07, Ross Paterson <ross@soi.city.ac.uk> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 09:16:38PM +0200, Josef Svenningsson wrote:
Despite the fact that we don't have a consensus I interpret the majority as a go for this patch.
In general, I think it's important to try for consensus with the core libraries. The discussion it requires is much more likely to explore the issues. Voting should be the last resort. That makes sense. What course of action do you suggest for this proposal then? I tried to continue the discussion with those who were against it in order to reach a consensus but I haven't gotten any replies. We could of course just drop the proposal but that seems a little unsatisfactory given the clear majority in favor.
So, any suggestions for how to proceed? /Josef