Re: Takeover of hashable and uuid & uuid-types packages

That would be fine. On Tue, Feb 16, 2021, 11:41 AM Oleg Grenrus wrote:

I don't disagree. Having hashable live next to unordered-containers in https://github.com/haskell-unordered-containers would be fine too, if you, David, agree with that.

- Oleg On 16.2.2021 18.37, David Feuer wrote:

My general view is that it's best for each package (or closely allied family of packages) to have its own GitHub organization.

On Tue, Feb 16, 2021, 11:27 AM Oleg Grenrus wrote:

...

github.com/haskell is fine too. I have uneasy feeling about its current "chaotic good" management model though, but I can live with it.

OTOH, you can simply bother me about any package in haskellari org. Clear and simple.

- Oleg On 16.2.2021 17.56, Johan Tibell wrote:

I'm not involved anymore so it's fine by me but why not https://github.com/haskell?

On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 4:26 PM Oleg Grenrus wrote:

...

I ask to take over the maintenance of hashable, uuid and uuid-types packages.

I'm a maintainer of packages depending on them (most notably quickcheck-instances and aeson).

I should also mention that when we (Herbert and I) took over Antoine Latter's packages, I took over quickcheck-instances and Herbert took over uuid and parsec. We should taken over together in the first place.

My first points of action would be: - make a releases supporting latest versions of dependencies (GHC-9.0, bytestring-0.11) and - move packages to https://github.com/haskellari organization, so in case of my absence there are people (Ryan Scott, bodigrim, few others) who will be able to act.

Best regards, Oleg

_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries