Re: Takeover of hashable and uuid & uuid-types packages
github.com/haskell is fine too. I have uneasy feeling about its current "chaotic good" management model though, but I can live with it. OTOH, you can simply bother me about any package in haskellari org. Clear and simple. - Oleg On 16.2.2021 17.56, Johan Tibell wrote:
I'm not involved anymore so it's fine by me but why not https://github.com/haskell?
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 4:26 PM Oleg Grenrus <oleg.grenrus@iki.fi <mailto:oleg.grenrus@iki.fi>> wrote:
I ask to take over the maintenance of hashable, uuid and uuid-types packages.
I'm a maintainer of packages depending on them (most notably quickcheck-instances and aeson).
I should also mention that when we (Herbert and I) took over Antoine Latter's packages, I took over quickcheck-instances and Herbert took over uuid and parsec. We should taken over together in the first place.
My first points of action would be: - make a releases supporting latest versions of dependencies (GHC-9.0, bytestring-0.11) and - move packages to https://github.com/haskellari organization, so in case of my absence there are people (Ryan Scott, bodigrim, few others) who will be able to act.
Best regards, Oleg
My general view is that it's best for each package (or closely allied family of packages) to have its own GitHub organization. On Tue, Feb 16, 2021, 11:27 AM Oleg Grenrus <oleg.grenrus@iki.fi> wrote:
github.com/haskell is fine too. I have uneasy feeling about its current "chaotic good" management model though, but I can live with it.
OTOH, you can simply bother me about any package in haskellari org. Clear and simple.
- Oleg On 16.2.2021 17.56, Johan Tibell wrote:
I'm not involved anymore so it's fine by me but why not https://github.com/haskell?
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 4:26 PM Oleg Grenrus <oleg.grenrus@iki.fi> wrote:
I ask to take over the maintenance of hashable, uuid and uuid-types packages.
I'm a maintainer of packages depending on them (most notably quickcheck-instances and aeson).
I should also mention that when we (Herbert and I) took over Antoine Latter's packages, I took over quickcheck-instances and Herbert took over uuid and parsec. We should taken over together in the first place.
My first points of action would be: - make a releases supporting latest versions of dependencies (GHC-9.0, bytestring-0.11) and - move packages to https://github.com/haskellari organization, so in case of my absence there are people (Ryan Scott, bodigrim, few others) who will be able to act.
Best regards, Oleg
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
I don't disagree. Having hashable live next to unordered-containers in https://github.com/haskell-unordered-containers would be fine too, if you, David, agree with that. - Oleg On 16.2.2021 18.37, David Feuer wrote:
My general view is that it's best for each package (or closely allied family of packages) to have its own GitHub organization.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021, 11:27 AM Oleg Grenrus <oleg.grenrus@iki.fi <mailto:oleg.grenrus@iki.fi>> wrote:
github.com/haskell <http://github.com/haskell> is fine too. I have uneasy feeling about its current "chaotic good" management model though, but I can live with it.
OTOH, you can simply bother me about any package in haskellari org. Clear and simple.
- Oleg
On 16.2.2021 17.56, Johan Tibell wrote:
I'm not involved anymore so it's fine by me but why not https://github.com/haskell?
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 4:26 PM Oleg Grenrus <oleg.grenrus@iki.fi <mailto:oleg.grenrus@iki.fi>> wrote:
I ask to take over the maintenance of hashable, uuid and uuid-types packages.
I'm a maintainer of packages depending on them (most notably quickcheck-instances and aeson).
I should also mention that when we (Herbert and I) took over Antoine Latter's packages, I took over quickcheck-instances and Herbert took over uuid and parsec. We should taken over together in the first place.
My first points of action would be: - make a releases supporting latest versions of dependencies (GHC-9.0, bytestring-0.11) and - move packages to https://github.com/haskellari organization, so in case of my absence there are people (Ryan Scott, bodigrim, few others) who will be able to act.
Best regards, Oleg
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org <mailto:Libraries@haskell.org> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
That would be fine. On Tue, Feb 16, 2021, 11:41 AM Oleg Grenrus <oleg.grenrus@iki.fi> wrote:
I don't disagree. Having hashable live next to unordered-containers in https://github.com/haskell-unordered-containers would be fine too, if you, David, agree with that.
- Oleg On 16.2.2021 18.37, David Feuer wrote:
My general view is that it's best for each package (or closely allied family of packages) to have its own GitHub organization.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021, 11:27 AM Oleg Grenrus <oleg.grenrus@iki.fi> wrote:
github.com/haskell is fine too. I have uneasy feeling about its current "chaotic good" management model though, but I can live with it.
OTOH, you can simply bother me about any package in haskellari org. Clear and simple.
- Oleg On 16.2.2021 17.56, Johan Tibell wrote:
I'm not involved anymore so it's fine by me but why not https://github.com/haskell?
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 4:26 PM Oleg Grenrus <oleg.grenrus@iki.fi> wrote:
I ask to take over the maintenance of hashable, uuid and uuid-types packages.
I'm a maintainer of packages depending on them (most notably quickcheck-instances and aeson).
I should also mention that when we (Herbert and I) took over Antoine Latter's packages, I took over quickcheck-instances and Herbert took over uuid and parsec. We should taken over together in the first place.
My first points of action would be: - make a releases supporting latest versions of dependencies (GHC-9.0, bytestring-0.11) and - move packages to https://github.com/haskellari organization, so in case of my absence there are people (Ryan Scott, bodigrim, few others) who will be able to act.
Best regards, Oleg
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
Thanks for taking this on Oleg On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 11:43 AM, David Feuer < david.feuer@gmail.com > wrote:
That would be fine.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021, 11:41 AM Oleg Grenrus < oleg. grenrus@ iki. fi ( oleg.grenrus@iki.fi ) > wrote:
I don't disagree. Having hashable live next to unordered-containers in https:/ / github. com/ haskell-unordered-containers ( https://github.com/haskell-unordered-containers ) would be fine too, if you, David, agree with that.
- Oleg
On 16.2.2021 18.37, David Feuer wrote:
My general view is that it's best for each package (or closely allied family of packages) to have its own GitHub organization.
On Tue, Feb 16 , 2021, 11:27 AM Oleg Grenrus < oleg. grenrus@ iki. fi ( oleg.grenrus@iki.fi ) > wrote:
github. com/ haskell ( http://github.com/haskell ) is fine too. I have uneasy feeling about its current "chaotic good" management model though, but I can live with it.
OTOH, you can simply bother me about any package in haskellari org. Clear and simple.
- Oleg
On 16.2.2021 17.56, Johan Tibell wrote:
I'm not involved anymore so it's fine by me but why not https:/ / github. com/ haskell ( https://github.com/haskell ) ?
On Tue, Feb 16 , 2021 at 4:26 PM Oleg Grenrus < oleg. grenrus@ iki. fi ( oleg.grenrus@iki.fi ) > wrote:
I ask to take over the maintenance of hashable, uuid and uuid-types packages.
I'm a maintainer of packages depending on them (most notably quickcheck-instances and aeson).
I should also mention that when we (Herbert and I) took over Antoine Latter's packages, I took over quickcheck-instances and Herbert took over uuid and parsec. We should taken over together in the first place.
My first points of action would be: - make a releases supporting latest versions of dependencies (GHC-9.0, bytestring-0.11) and - move packages to https:/ / github. com/ haskellari ( https://github.com/haskellari ) organization, so in case of my absence there are people (Ryan Scott, bodigrim, few others) who will be able to act.
Best regards, Oleg
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@ haskell. org ( Libraries@haskell.org ) http:/ / mail. haskell. org/ cgi-bin/ mailman/ listinfo/ libraries ( http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries )
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@ haskell. org ( Libraries@haskell.org ) http:/ / mail. haskell. org/ cgi-bin/ mailman/ listinfo/ libraries ( http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries )
Thank you all for your support. I really appreciate your trust. I'd like to use this opportunity to mention that there are few documentation related issues [1], and I'll welcome patches resolving these. Cheers, Oleg. - [1]: https://github.com/haskell-unordered-containers/hashable/labels/Documentatio... On 16.2.2021 18.50, Emily Pillmore wrote:
Thanks for taking this on Oleg
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 11:43 AM, David Feuer <david.feuer@gmail.com <mailto:david.feuer@gmail.com>> wrote:
That would be fine.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021, 11:41 AM Oleg Grenrus <oleg.grenrus@iki.fi <mailto:oleg.grenrus@iki.fi>> wrote:
I don't disagree. Having hashable live next to unordered-containers in https://github.com/haskell-unordered-containers <https://github.com/haskell-unordered-containers> would be fine too, if you, David, agree with that.
- Oleg
On 16.2.2021 18.37, David Feuer wrote:
My general view is that it's best for each package (or closely allied family of packages) to have its own GitHub organization.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021, 11:27 AM Oleg Grenrus <oleg.grenrus@iki.fi <mailto:oleg.grenrus@iki.fi>> wrote:
github.com/haskell <http://github.com/haskell> is fine too. I have uneasy feeling about its current "chaotic good" management model though, but I can live with it.
OTOH, you can simply bother me about any package in haskellari org. Clear and simple.
- Oleg
On 16.2.2021 17.56, Johan Tibell wrote:
I'm not involved anymore so it's fine by me but why not https://github.com/haskell <https://github.com/haskell>?
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 4:26 PM Oleg Grenrus <oleg.grenrus@iki.fi <mailto:oleg.grenrus@iki.fi>> wrote:
I ask to take over the maintenance of hashable, uuid and uuid-types packages.
I'm a maintainer of packages depending on them (most notably quickcheck-instances and aeson).
I should also mention that when we (Herbert and I) took over Antoine Latter's packages, I took over quickcheck-instances and Herbert took over uuid and parsec. We should taken over together in the first place.
My first points of action would be: - make a releases supporting latest versions of dependencies (GHC-9.0, bytestring-0.11) and - move packages to https://github.com/haskellari <https://github.com/haskellari> organization, so in case of my absence there are people (Ryan Scott, bodigrim, few others) who will be able to act.
Best regards, Oleg
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org <mailto:Libraries@haskell.org> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries <http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries>
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org <mailto:Libraries@haskell.org> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries <http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries>
Sounds reasonable to me! Am Di., 16. Feb. 2021 um 17:42 Uhr schrieb Oleg Grenrus <oleg.grenrus@iki.fi
:
I don't disagree. Having hashable live next to unordered-containers in https://github.com/haskell-unordered-containers would be fine too, if you, David, agree with that.
- Oleg On 16.2.2021 18.37, David Feuer wrote:
My general view is that it's best for each package (or closely allied family of packages) to have its own GitHub organization.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021, 11:27 AM Oleg Grenrus <oleg.grenrus@iki.fi> wrote:
github.com/haskell is fine too. I have uneasy feeling about its current "chaotic good" management model though, but I can live with it.
OTOH, you can simply bother me about any package in haskellari org. Clear and simple.
- Oleg On 16.2.2021 17.56, Johan Tibell wrote:
I'm not involved anymore so it's fine by me but why not https://github.com/haskell?
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 4:26 PM Oleg Grenrus <oleg.grenrus@iki.fi> wrote:
I ask to take over the maintenance of hashable, uuid and uuid-types packages.
I'm a maintainer of packages depending on them (most notably quickcheck-instances and aeson).
I should also mention that when we (Herbert and I) took over Antoine Latter's packages, I took over quickcheck-instances and Herbert took over uuid and parsec. We should taken over together in the first place.
My first points of action would be: - make a releases supporting latest versions of dependencies (GHC-9.0, bytestring-0.11) and - move packages to https://github.com/haskellari organization, so in case of my absence there are people (Ryan Scott, bodigrim, few others) who will be able to act.
Best regards, Oleg
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
As someone currently being bitten by the status quo, this sounds eminently practical. Either version of you just claiming it, or placing control of it with unordered-containers works fine. -Edward On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 8:54 AM Simon Jakobi via Libraries < libraries@haskell.org> wrote:
Sounds reasonable to me!
Am Di., 16. Feb. 2021 um 17:42 Uhr schrieb Oleg Grenrus < oleg.grenrus@iki.fi>:
I don't disagree. Having hashable live next to unordered-containers in https://github.com/haskell-unordered-containers would be fine too, if you, David, agree with that.
- Oleg On 16.2.2021 18.37, David Feuer wrote:
My general view is that it's best for each package (or closely allied family of packages) to have its own GitHub organization.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021, 11:27 AM Oleg Grenrus <oleg.grenrus@iki.fi> wrote:
github.com/haskell is fine too. I have uneasy feeling about its current "chaotic good" management model though, but I can live with it.
OTOH, you can simply bother me about any package in haskellari org. Clear and simple.
- Oleg On 16.2.2021 17.56, Johan Tibell wrote:
I'm not involved anymore so it's fine by me but why not https://github.com/haskell?
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 4:26 PM Oleg Grenrus <oleg.grenrus@iki.fi> wrote:
I ask to take over the maintenance of hashable, uuid and uuid-types packages.
I'm a maintainer of packages depending on them (most notably quickcheck-instances and aeson).
I should also mention that when we (Herbert and I) took over Antoine Latter's packages, I took over quickcheck-instances and Herbert took over uuid and parsec. We should taken over together in the first place.
My first points of action would be: - make a releases supporting latest versions of dependencies (GHC-9.0, bytestring-0.11) and - move packages to https://github.com/haskellari organization, so in case of my absence there are people (Ryan Scott, bodigrim, few others) who will be able to act.
Best regards, Oleg
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
participants (5)
-
David Feuer -
Edward Kmett -
Emily Pillmore -
Oleg Grenrus -
Simon Jakobi