Just to add my 2ct that it definitely don't work well for Scala.
That being said, it should be possible to have some nice UI/UX to help
investigate such things... but the approach Scala documentation is using is
definitely not ideal.
On 24 June 2014 17:20, Bryan O'Sullivan
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 3:42 AM, Mateusz Kowalczyk < fuuzetsu@fuuzetsu.co.uk> wrote:
Do you have anything specific in mind here? At first I was just going to dismiss this as wishful thinking but perhaps we could actually do something about this.
Maybe we could provide ‘alternative’ signatures which would make types more specific with some (which? all of known ones?) instances.
You can already see how that works out with Scala documentation, which is an incomprehensible mess.
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
-- *A\ois* http://twitter.com/aloiscochard http://github.com/aloiscochard