On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 22:25, Ben Boeckel
beyond what is already done in xmobar itself. There's also the question of whether an X11-Xrandr package makes more sense (Xinerama is already there, but xft isn't). I imagine xmobar would also pick up the code that gets put into X11 or X11-Xrandr for its Xrandr needs instead of its own bindings if/when that happens.
There's already an X11-xft package (which includes Render (not RandR) support; I'm not sure if that belongs there). As to RandR, my inclination is that it should be part of X11, not a separate package — as long as the package continues to work in the absence of RandR. -- brandon s allbery allbery.b@gmail.com wandering unix systems administrator (available) (412) 475-9364 vm/sms