8 Apr
2011
8 Apr
'11
10:13 p.m.
В Fri, 8 Apr 2011 14:46:10 -0700 Konstantin Sobolev <konstantin.sobolev@gmail.com> пишет:
Regardless of whether or not the default ComboP should follow this changed behavior, the common code means that one should probably be written in terms of the other.
I think I can add one more Bool parameter to combineTwoP telling if the whole layout must be replaced by one of the two sub-layouts if another sub-layout is empty.
Yes. It's very good idea. -- Best regards, Michael