
Thanks Anton,
I've pushed the patch.
Unfortunately I've made a bit of a mess of the history by including both
patches, and then needing to address the conflicts with another patch.
Regards,
Adam
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 3:36 AM, Anton Pirogov
Hi Adam,
thank you for your suggestions! Indeed I didn't need those instances and I changed the message to your more flexible idea!
I don't know what is the right way to do it here and with darcs in general, I used "darcs obliterate --last 1" and recorded a new patch. Here is the updated patch, I hope it is ok now.
Regards, Anton
2015-03-04 1:03 GMT+01:00 adam vogt
: Hi Anton,
Do you actually need the Read/Show instances? I think it's better to put a function in the message:
data ModifySpacing = ModifySpacing (Int -> Int)
And possibly export these convenience functions:
setSpacing n = sendMessage (ModifySpacing (\_ -> n)) incSpacing n = sendMessage (ModifySpacing (+n))
Regards, Adam
This is such a small change that I think that it makes more sense to
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Anton Pirogov
wrote: patch it, instead of rolling my own. It just adds the message, nothing more, so it does not break anything.
Thanks!
Best regards, Anton Pirogov
_______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad
_______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad