google code issues

Brandon Allbery

6 Aug 2015 6 Aug '15

10:51 a.m.

So are we going to do anything about Google Code Issues going away in a little over two weeks? -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net

Attachments:

attachment.html (text/html — 678 bytes)

Show replies by date

Tuncer Ayaz

6 Aug 6 Aug

1:46 p.m.

On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:

...

So are we going to do anything about Google Code Issues going away in a little over two weeks?

First question is whether existing tickets have to be preserved. If so, then where should the migration lead to? Second question is whether Darcs a strict requirement. If so, hub.darcs.net could work, as darcs support on haskell.org seems to be deprecated. Either way, wasn't the plan to move to haskell.org's infrastructure and leverage Phabricator (with hg or git)? For a feature overview, see http://phabricator.org/comparison/. That seems like a good "future-proof" path to take, if you ask me. Alternatively, Bitbucket, Gitlab, or Github could make sense. Gitlab has its own CI tool, so that's a plus, but other than that (for XMonad's case) there's no clear winner between the three. Also, like the pending release, this is another administrative topic for which there seems to be nobody responsible who also happens to be blessed with enough free time. Therefore, it's important to assign the tasks, once the migration path has been decided.

Peter Jones

2:47 p.m.

Tuncer Ayaz writes:

...

On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:

...
So are we going to do anything about Google Code Issues going away in a little over two weeks?

First question is whether existing tickets have to be preserved. If so, then where should the migration lead to?

Second question is whether Darcs a strict requirement. If so, hub.darcs.net could work, as darcs support on haskell.org seems to be deprecated.

Either way, wasn't the plan to move to haskell.org's infrastructure and leverage Phabricator (with hg or git)? For a feature overview, see http://phabricator.org/comparison/. That seems like a good "future-proof" path to take, if you ask me.

Alternatively, Bitbucket, Gitlab, or Github could make sense. Gitlab has its own CI tool, so that's a plus, but other than that (for XMonad's case) there's no clear winner between the three.

Also, like the pending release, this is another administrative topic for which there seems to be nobody responsible who also happens to be blessed with enough free time. Therefore, it's important to assign the tasks, once the migration path has been decided.

We all have strong opinions about which tools and hosting providers we should be using. That seems to have stalled any movement on this front. We're not all going to agree on this so we should just accept that all of the options are workable and pick the one with the least amount of resistance. I volunteer to be the release manager for the project if we switch to Git and host the code and tickets on Github. It's not a perfect solution but it does have everything we need and there's almost an expectation these days that open source projects are hosted on it. This might have the side effect of increasing the number of contributions to xmonad. At the very least it gives the project more visibility. -- Peter Jones, Founder, Devalot.com Defending the honor of good code

Daniel Wagner

11 Aug 11 Aug

2:41 p.m.

For what it's worth, I tried to follow the instructions on https://code.google.com/p/support-tools/wiki/IssueExporterTool today to grab a backup of our issues, and failed in the very first step: % git clone https://code.google.com/p/support-tools Cloning into 'support-tools'... fatal: missing blob object '2f78cf5b66514f2506d9af5f3dadf3dee7aa6d9f' fatal: remote did not send all necessary objects Unexpected end of command stream zsh: exit 128 I don't suppose any of you have a copy of the tool because you exported issues from a different project...? ~d On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Peter Jones wrote:

...

Tuncer Ayaz writes:

...
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:

...
So are we going to do anything about Google Code Issues going away in a little over two weeks?

First question is whether existing tickets have to be preserved. If so, then where should the migration lead to?

Second question is whether Darcs a strict requirement. If so, hub.darcs.net could work, as darcs support on haskell.org seems to be deprecated.

Either way, wasn't the plan to move to haskell.org's infrastructure and leverage Phabricator (with hg or git)? For a feature overview, see http://phabricator.org/comparison/. That seems like a good "future-proof" path to take, if you ask me.

Alternatively, Bitbucket, Gitlab, or Github could make sense. Gitlab has its own CI tool, so that's a plus, but other than that (for XMonad's case) there's no clear winner between the three.

Also, like the pending release, this is another administrative topic for which there seems to be nobody responsible who also happens to be blessed with enough free time. Therefore, it's important to assign the tasks, once the migration path has been decided.

We all have strong opinions about which tools and hosting providers we should be using. That seems to have stalled any movement on this front. We're not all going to agree on this so we should just accept that all of the options are workable and pick the one with the least amount of resistance.

I volunteer to be the release manager for the project if we switch to Git and host the code and tickets on Github.

It's not a perfect solution but it does have everything we need and there's almost an expectation these days that open source projects are hosted on it. This might have the side effect of increasing the number of contributions to xmonad. At the very least it gives the project more visibility.

-- Peter Jones, Founder, Devalot.com Defending the honor of good code

_______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad

Brandon Allbery

2:44 p.m.

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Daniel Wagner wrote:

...

% git clone https://code.google.com/p/support-tools Cloning into 'support-tools'... fatal: missing blob object '2f78cf5b66514f2506d9af5f3dadf3dee7aa6d9f' fatal: remote did not send all necessary objects Unexpected end of command stream zsh: exit 128

I just cloned this successfully. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net

Daniel Wagner

15 Aug 15 Aug

10:21 p.m.

A quick update: I was able to clone the support-tools repo today, but it doesn't matter anyway; the tools are not needed to download a dump of the issues for a project. I don't believe we have any sensitive security issues, so I'll be hosting a public copy of this dump: http://dmwit.com/xmonad-issue-archive-20150816T014056Z.tgz At the very least we shouldn't lose anything, though it would still be good to migrate this to somewhere writable sometime in the near future. ~d On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Brandon Allbery wrote:

...

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Daniel Wagner wrote:

...
% git clone https://code.google.com/p/support-tools Cloning into 'support-tools'... fatal: missing blob object '2f78cf5b66514f2506d9af5f3dadf3dee7aa6d9f' fatal: remote did not send all necessary objects Unexpected end of command stream zsh: exit 128

I just cloned this successfully.

-- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net

_______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad

Brandon Allbery

10:42 p.m.

On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Daniel Wagner wrote:

...

At the very least we shouldn't lose anything, though it would still be good to migrate this to somewhere writable sometime in the near future.

At this point I'm more than half minded to push stuff to my github account and then import the issues there. Main problem being I've not yet dealt with permissions on github, and presumably I would not be the only person who should have commit access. (I'm not even sure I should have commit access to the core, which would make being the owner of the core repo ... difficult.) -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net

adam vogt

11:09 p.m.

My understanding is that you make a group on github. If you recall a few years ago, we had Alfredo Di Napoli make one, but the repo(s) have not been kept in sync. I can delete that one and we can start anew. The way "diagrams" uses github might be an example to follow. I'm more comfortable with darcs, but either way (phabricator/github) it looks like things have to change. Brandon/Daniel/Peter: we need more than one semi-active person (me) to take responsibility for the project, so it would be good for one of you to take more ownership. Regards, Adam On Aug 15, 2015 10:42 PM, "Brandon Allbery" wrote:

...

On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Daniel Wagner wrote:

...
At the very least we shouldn't lose anything, though it would still be good to migrate this to somewhere writable sometime in the near future.

At this point I'm more than half minded to push stuff to my github account and then import the issues there. Main problem being I've not yet dealt with permissions on github, and presumably I would not be the only person who should have commit access. (I'm not even sure I should have commit access to the core, which would make being the owner of the core repo ... difficult.)

-- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net

_______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad

Peter Jones

16 Aug 16 Aug

4:44 p.m.

adam vogt writes:

...

My understanding is that you make a group on github. If you recall a few years ago, we had Alfredo Di Napoli make one, but the repo(s) have not been kept in sync. I can delete that one and we can start anew. The way "diagrams" uses github might be an example to follow.

That's exactly what I'd suggest. With groups you can have different repos for the xmonad-related projects and control who has commit access to which repos.

...

Brandon/Daniel/Peter: we need more than one semi-active person (me) to take responsibility for the project, so it would be good for one of you to take more ownership.

Sounds good to me. My github username is pjones. -- Peter Jones, Founder, Devalot.com Defending the honor of good code

Daniel Wagner

17 Aug 17 Aug

12:53 p.m.

I follow along on the mailing list, but I don't actually use xmonad any more; I've tried maintaining projects I don't use in the past and that has not gone well. ~d On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 8:09 PM, adam vogt wrote:

...

My understanding is that you make a group on github. If you recall a few years ago, we had Alfredo Di Napoli make one, but the repo(s) have not been kept in sync. I can delete that one and we can start anew. The way "diagrams" uses github might be an example to follow.

I'm more comfortable with darcs, but either way (phabricator/github) it looks like things have to change.

Brandon/Daniel/Peter: we need more than one semi-active person (me) to take responsibility for the project, so it would be good for one of you to take more ownership.

Regards, Adam On Aug 15, 2015 10:42 PM, "Brandon Allbery" wrote:

...
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Daniel Wagner wrote:

...
At the very least we shouldn't lose anything, though it would still be good to migrate this to somewhere writable sometime in the near future.

At this point I'm more than half minded to push stuff to my github account and then import the issues there. Main problem being I've not yet dealt with permissions on github, and presumably I would not be the only person who should have commit access. (I'm not even sure I should have commit access to the core, which would make being the owner of the core repo ... difficult.)

-- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net

_______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad

_______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad

Brent Yorgey

20 Aug 20 Aug

4:33 p.m.

I still use xmonad and have been recently trying to play a slightly more active (though still not very active) role in applying patches and so forth. I'd be happy to be added if we set up a github organization. On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 11:53 AM Daniel Wagner wrote:

...

I follow along on the mailing list, but I don't actually use xmonad any more; I've tried maintaining projects I don't use in the past and that has not gone well. ~d

On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 8:09 PM, adam vogt wrote:

...
My understanding is that you make a group on github. If you recall a few years ago, we had Alfredo Di Napoli make one, but the repo(s) have not been kept in sync. I can delete that one and we can start anew. The way "diagrams" uses github might be an example to follow.

I'm more comfortable with darcs, but either way (phabricator/github) it looks like things have to change.

Brandon/Daniel/Peter: we need more than one semi-active person (me) to take responsibility for the project, so it would be good for one of you to take more ownership.

Regards, Adam On Aug 15, 2015 10:42 PM, "Brandon Allbery" wrote:

...
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Daniel Wagner wrote:

...
At the very least we shouldn't lose anything, though it would still be good to migrate this to somewhere writable sometime in the near future.

At this point I'm more than half minded to push stuff to my github account and then import the issues there. Main problem being I've not yet dealt with permissions on github, and presumably I would not be the only person who should have commit access. (I'm not even sure I should have commit access to the core, which would make being the owner of the core repo ... difficult.)

-- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net

_______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad

_______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad

_______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad

Brandon Allbery

21 Aug 21 Aug

9:46 p.m.

I'm going to set up an "xmonad.org" organization on github tomorrow unless I hear otherwise by then (or the existing "xmonad" org is deleted). I will add byorgey as member; others? On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Brent Yorgey wrote:

...

I still use xmonad and have been recently trying to play a slightly more active (though still not very active) role in applying patches and so forth. I'd be happy to be added if we set up a github organization.

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 11:53 AM Daniel Wagner wrote:

...
I follow along on the mailing list, but I don't actually use xmonad any more; I've tried maintaining projects I don't use in the past and that has not gone well. ~d

On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 8:09 PM, adam vogt wrote:

...
My understanding is that you make a group on github. If you recall a few years ago, we had Alfredo Di Napoli make one, but the repo(s) have not been kept in sync. I can delete that one and we can start anew. The way "diagrams" uses github might be an example to follow.

I'm more comfortable with darcs, but either way (phabricator/github) it looks like things have to change.

Brandon/Daniel/Peter: we need more than one semi-active person (me) to take responsibility for the project, so it would be good for one of you to take more ownership.

Regards, Adam On Aug 15, 2015 10:42 PM, "Brandon Allbery" wrote:

...
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Daniel Wagner wrote:

...
At the very least we shouldn't lose anything, though it would still be good to migrate this to somewhere writable sometime in the near future.

At this point I'm more than half minded to push stuff to my github account and then import the issues there. Main problem being I've not yet dealt with permissions on github, and presumably I would not be the only person who should have commit access. (I'm not even sure I should have commit access to the core, which would make being the owner of the core repo ... difficult.)

-- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net

_______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad

_______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad

_______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad

_______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad

-- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net

Brandon Allbery

22 Aug 22 Aug

2:22 p.m.

xmonad and xmonad-contrib repos added; aavogt and byorgey added as maintainers, I presume others will be needed/wanted. (I may go hunting for github ids of people already listed on xmonad.org) now looking into triaging and migrating issues, which will be interesting because github issues are per repo instead of per org like we were doing with google code. On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:

...

I'm going to set up an "xmonad.org" organization on github tomorrow unless I hear otherwise by then (or the existing "xmonad" org is deleted). I will add byorgey as member; others?

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Brent Yorgey wrote:

...
I still use xmonad and have been recently trying to play a slightly more active (though still not very active) role in applying patches and so forth. I'd be happy to be added if we set up a github organization.

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 11:53 AM Daniel Wagner wrote:

...
I follow along on the mailing list, but I don't actually use xmonad any more; I've tried maintaining projects I don't use in the past and that has not gone well. ~d

On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 8:09 PM, adam vogt wrote:

...
My understanding is that you make a group on github. If you recall a few years ago, we had Alfredo Di Napoli make one, but the repo(s) have not been kept in sync. I can delete that one and we can start anew. The way "diagrams" uses github might be an example to follow.

I'm more comfortable with darcs, but either way (phabricator/github) it looks like things have to change.

Brandon/Daniel/Peter: we need more than one semi-active person (me) to take responsibility for the project, so it would be good for one of you to take more ownership.

Regards, Adam On Aug 15, 2015 10:42 PM, "Brandon Allbery" wrote:

...
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Daniel Wagner wrote:

...
At the very least we shouldn't lose anything, though it would still be good to migrate this to somewhere writable sometime in the near future.

At this point I'm more than half minded to push stuff to my github account and then import the issues there. Main problem being I've not yet dealt with permissions on github, and presumably I would not be the only person who should have commit access. (I'm not even sure I should have commit access to the core, which would make being the owner of the core repo ... difficult.)

-- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net

_______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad

_______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad

_______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad

_______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad

-- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net

-- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net

Devin Mullins

3:03 p.m.

You can add me, twifkak. (I've been lurking; can't promise a lot of attention, but I'll try.) On Aug 22, 2015 11:22 AM, "Brandon Allbery" wrote:

...

xmonad and xmonad-contrib repos added; aavogt and byorgey added as maintainers, I presume others will be needed/wanted. (I may go hunting for github ids of people already listed on xmonad.org)

now looking into triaging and migrating issues, which will be interesting because github issues are per repo instead of per org like we were doing with google code.

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:

...
I'm going to set up an "xmonad.org" organization on github tomorrow unless I hear otherwise by then (or the existing "xmonad" org is deleted). I will add byorgey as member; others?

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Brent Yorgey wrote:

...
I still use xmonad and have been recently trying to play a slightly more active (though still not very active) role in applying patches and so forth. I'd be happy to be added if we set up a github organization.

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 11:53 AM Daniel Wagner wrote:

...
I follow along on the mailing list, but I don't actually use xmonad any more; I've tried maintaining projects I don't use in the past and that has not gone well. ~d

On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 8:09 PM, adam vogt wrote:

...
My understanding is that you make a group on github. If you recall a few years ago, we had Alfredo Di Napoli make one, but the repo(s) have not been kept in sync. I can delete that one and we can start anew. The way "diagrams" uses github might be an example to follow.

I'm more comfortable with darcs, but either way (phabricator/github) it looks like things have to change.

Brandon/Daniel/Peter: we need more than one semi-active person (me) to take responsibility for the project, so it would be good for one of you to take more ownership.

Regards, Adam On Aug 15, 2015 10:42 PM, "Brandon Allbery" wrote:

...
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Daniel Wagner wrote:

> At the very least we shouldn't lose anything, though it would still > be good to migrate this to somewhere writable sometime in the near future.

At this point I'm more than half minded to push stuff to my github account and then import the issues there. Main problem being I've not yet dealt with permissions on github, and presumably I would not be the only person who should have commit access. (I'm not even sure I should have commit access to the core, which would make being the owner of the core repo ... difficult.)

-- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net

_______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad

_______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad

_______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad

_______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad

-- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net

-- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net

_______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad

Brandon Allbery

23 Aug 23 Aug

10:07 a.m.

The issue exporter is apparently quite worthless: - github rate-limits beyond what its API and documentation claim, so I got all of 4 issues uploaded before getting "abuse limit reached, try again in an hour". This after registering and using an API token, and the headers show that it is indeed authenticating via the token (limit 5000 instead of 60, and plenty of it left when it throttles anyway) - it apparently only maps usernames if I manually construct a username map, and possibly not even then if I'm reading the support-tools issue tracker properly (The export wizard, it turns out, works properly --- but only if the repo doesn't exist initially, and apparently not if your repo isn't also in Google Code.) So apparently we get to start over from scratch with the issues. :/ On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:

...

xmonad and xmonad-contrib repos added; aavogt and byorgey added as maintainers, I presume others will be needed/wanted. (I may go hunting for github ids of people already listed on xmonad.org)

now looking into triaging and migrating issues, which will be interesting because github issues are per repo instead of per org like we were doing with google code.

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:

...
I'm going to set up an "xmonad.org" organization on github tomorrow unless I hear otherwise by then (or the existing "xmonad" org is deleted). I will add byorgey as member; others?

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Brent Yorgey wrote:

...
I still use xmonad and have been recently trying to play a slightly more active (though still not very active) role in applying patches and so forth. I'd be happy to be added if we set up a github organization.

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 11:53 AM Daniel Wagner wrote:

...
I follow along on the mailing list, but I don't actually use xmonad any more; I've tried maintaining projects I don't use in the past and that has not gone well. ~d

On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 8:09 PM, adam vogt wrote:

...
My understanding is that you make a group on github. If you recall a few years ago, we had Alfredo Di Napoli make one, but the repo(s) have not been kept in sync. I can delete that one and we can start anew. The way "diagrams" uses github might be an example to follow.

I'm more comfortable with darcs, but either way (phabricator/github) it looks like things have to change.

Brandon/Daniel/Peter: we need more than one semi-active person (me) to take responsibility for the project, so it would be good for one of you to take more ownership.

Regards, Adam On Aug 15, 2015 10:42 PM, "Brandon Allbery" wrote:

...
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Daniel Wagner wrote:

> At the very least we shouldn't lose anything, though it would still > be good to migrate this to somewhere writable sometime in the near future.

At this point I'm more than half minded to push stuff to my github account and then import the issues there. Main problem being I've not yet dealt with permissions on github, and presumably I would not be the only person who should have commit access. (I'm not even sure I should have commit access to the core, which would make being the owner of the core repo ... difficult.)

-- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net

_______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad

_______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad

_______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad

_______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad

-- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net

-- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net

-- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net

Tomas Janousek

27 Jan 27 Jan

1:15 p.m.

Hi all, On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 02:22:04PM -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote:

...

xmonad and xmonad-contrib repos added; aavogt and byorgey added as maintainers, I presume others will be needed/wanted. (I may go hunting for github ids of people already listed on xmonad.org)

Could someone please push a notice to the old darcs repos saying they are abandoned? I've been doing darcs pulls on a semi-monthly basis for the last 6 years and it took me a few months to realize that “No remote patches to pull in!” means the code was moved instead of xmonad finally being perfect and needing no further changes whatsoever. :-) In the unlikely event I'm not alone, it may help someone realize this sooner. Thanks. -- Tomáš Janoušek, a.k.a. Pivník, a.k.a. Liskni_si, http://work.lisk.in/

adam vogt

2:01 p.m.

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Tomas Janousek wrote:

...

Hi all,

On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 02:22:04PM -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote:

...
xmonad and xmonad-contrib repos added; aavogt and byorgey added as maintainers, I presume others will be needed/wanted. (I may go hunting for github ids of people already listed on xmonad.org)

Could someone please push a notice to the old darcs repos saying they are abandoned?

I've been doing darcs pulls on a semi-monthly basis for the last 6 years and it took me a few months to realize that “No remote patches to pull in!” means the code was moved instead of xmonad finally being perfect and needing no further changes whatsoever. :-)

In the unlikely event I'm not alone, it may help someone realize this sooner. Thanks.

Hi Tomas, The two repos now have a _darcs/prefs/motd that tells people to go to github Regards, Adam

Christopher Reichert

23 Aug 23 Aug

12:52 a.m.

Great, I noticed these are up now. I'll definitely be watching the repo and trying to help any way possible. On Fri, Aug 21 2015, Brandon Allbery wrote:

...

I'm going to set up an "xmonad.org" organization on github tomorrow unless I hear otherwise by then (or the existing "xmonad" org is deleted). I will add byorgey as member; others?

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Brent Yorgey wrote:

...
I still use xmonad and have been recently trying to play a slightly more active (though still not very active) role in applying patches and so forth. I'd be happy to be added if we set up a github organization.

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 11:53 AM Daniel Wagner wrote:

...
I follow along on the mailing list, but I don't actually use xmonad any more; I've tried maintaining projects I don't use in the past and that has not gone well. ~d

On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 8:09 PM, adam vogt wrote:

...
My understanding is that you make a group on github. If you recall a few years ago, we had Alfredo Di Napoli make one, but the repo(s) have not been kept in sync. I can delete that one and we can start anew. The way "diagrams" uses github might be an example to follow.

I'm more comfortable with darcs, but either way (phabricator/github) it looks like things have to change.

Brandon/Daniel/Peter: we need more than one semi-active person (me) to take responsibility for the project, so it would be good for one of you to take more ownership.

Regards, Adam On Aug 15, 2015 10:42 PM, "Brandon Allbery" wrote:

...
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Daniel Wagner wrote:

...
At the very least we shouldn't lose anything, though it would still be good to migrate this to somewhere writable sometime in the near future.

At this point I'm more than half minded to push stuff to my github account and then import the issues there. Main problem being I've not yet dealt with permissions on github, and presumably I would not be the only person who should have commit access. (I'm not even sure I should have commit access to the core, which would make being the owner of the core repo ... difficult.)

-- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net

_______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad

_______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad

_______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad

_______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad

-- Christopher Reichert irc: creichert gpg: C81D 18C8 862A 3618 1376 FFA5 6BFC A992 9955 929B

Ben Boeckel

9 a.m.

On Sat, 22 Aug, 2015 at 01:46:15 GMT, Brandon Allbery wrote:

...

I'm going to set up an "xmonad.org" organization on github tomorrow unless I hear otherwise by then (or the existing "xmonad" org is deleted). I will add byorgey as member; others?

I'd be interested (I have one or two modules I'm listed as maintainer of). I also have a few issues I'd like to tackle (namely modal dialog parent tracking and focus policies associated with it). Also interested in a Wayland-xmonad. I'm also fine with just doing pull requests (since I'd use them even with commit access). --Ben

3401

Age (days ago)

3575

Last active (days ago)

List overview

Download

18 comments

10 participants

participants (10)

adam vogt
Ben Boeckel
Brandon Allbery
Brent Yorgey
Christopher Reichert
Daniel Wagner
Devin Mullins
Peter Jones
Tomas Janousek
Tuncer Ayaz