I meant that as a top-level syntactic thing, to avoid writing "import CSS" in the let/where blocks, for multiple top-level definitions that use the same import. Just premature bikeshed :-) On 06/08/2015 12:15 AM, "Oliver Charles" <ollie@ocharles.org.uk> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:12 PM Moritz Kiefer <moritz.kiefer@gmail.com> wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 5. August 2015 14:59:54 UTC+2 schrieb Mike Ledger:
This would be really handy to have. You could also have import "blocks", like
import Foo in { ... }
Where {...} is a new layout block, I guess.
Is *let* not exactly this block feature?
Indeed, in my post I use let bindings to achieve this:
let import CSS in [ width (px 50) ]
You could also add other local bindings to your scope:
let import CSS sizeInPx = px 50 in [ width sizePx, height sizeInPx ]
(Note that just like let the other bindings have access to the symbols that were imported)
*ocharles*
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe