Re: [web-devel] ALPHA: http-types 0.1

Sure, will do both. How comprehensive should the header list be? Am 04.02.2011 11:05 schrieb "Michael Snoyman" : On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Aristid Breitkreuz wrote:

Writing this ... Yes, for functions I don't care what you name things. It's specifically data constructors that breaks backwards compatibility.

Headers are already there, no? You're confusing me. I was talking about the semi-exhaustive list of headers that people often request, eg hdrAccept = "Accept", hdrContentType = "Content-Type", etc. It was brought up in the original thread.

Thanks for the nice feedback!

Aristid "sent from my Android"

Am 04.02.2011 07:09 schrie...