4 Feb
2011
4 Feb
'11
2:15 a.m.
Sure, will do both. How comprehensive should the header list be? Am 04.02.2011 11:05 schrieb "Michael Snoyman" <michael@snoyman.com>: On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Aristid Breitkreuz <aristidb@googlemail.com> wrote:
Writing this ... Yes, for functions I don't care what you name things. It's specifically data constructors that breaks backwards compatibility.
Headers are already there, no? You're confusing me. I was talking about the semi-exhaustive list of headers that people often request, eg hdrAccept = "Accept", hdrContentType = "Content-Type", etc. It was brought up in the original thread.
Thanks for the nice feedback!
Aristid "sent from my Android"
Am 04.02.2011 07:09 schrie...