April 2010 - xmonad - Haskell.org

Re: Issue 135 in xmonad: toggleBorders (XMonad.Action.NoBorders) Causes floating windows to grow in size
by codesite-noreply＠google.com 16 Jan '13

16 Jan '13

Comment #2 on issue 135 by neoraider: toggleBorders (XMonad.Action.NoBorders) Causes floating windows to grow in size http://code.google.com/p/xmonad/issues/detail?id=135 This bug occurred when I tried to disable the border of a Gnome-Do window automatically (it doesn't look nice with one), causing the Gnome-Do window to grow indefinitely, filling the whole screen after a few seconds. The attached patch solves the problem for me, making XMonad.Operations.floatLocation use the actual window border width instead of the globally configured one. Attachments: xmonad.patch 588 bytes -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings

1 2

Re: Issue 306 in xmonad: Magnifier: keep magnified status if transient focused
by codesite-noreply＠google.com 11 Jan '13

11 Jan '13

Updates: Status: Accepted Labels: Type-Enhancement Component-Contrib Comment #3 on issue 306 by byorgey: Magnifier: keep magnified status if transient focused http://code.google.com/p/xmonad/issues/detail?id=306 This shouldn't be too difficult to implement (either Riccardo or Daniel's proposed behavior) given the new extensible state. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings

1 3

Re: Issue 304 in xmonad: CycleWS should actually track workspace history rather than depending on order of hidden workspaces
by codesite-noreply＠google.com 09 Jan '13

09 Jan '13

Updates: Summary: CycleWS should actually track workspace history rather than depending on order of hidden workspaces Status: Accepted Labels: Type-Enhancement Component-Contrib Comment #2 on issue 304 by byorgey: CycleWS should actually track workspace history rather than depending on order of hidden workspaces http://code.google.com/p/xmonad/issues/detail?id=304 The problem is that toggleWS simply assumes that the "previous workspace" is the one at the head of xmonad's internal list of hidden workspaces. But there are various operations other than switching away from a workspace which will also place it at the head of this list. There is nothing special about scratchpads here; if you shift any window on the current workspace to another workspace, that other workspace will now be the "previous workspace" as far as toggleWS is concerned. The real problem is that the order of workspaces in xmonad's list of hidden workspaces is not really supposed to mean anything, so toggleWS is depending on undefined behavior. The only way to really fix this would be to have CycleWS track the workspace history itself. Here's a sketch of a possible solution: CycleWS could use the new extensible state to track the workspace history, and provide something to put in the logHook that would notify CycleWS every time the current workspace changes. (It would be nicer if putting something in the logHook was not necessary, but otherwise it is not clear how CycleWS would find out about workspace changes.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings

1 3

Re: Issue 316 in xmonad: AvoidStruts gives wrong window heights with vertically stacked screens
by codesite-noreply＠google.com 03 Jan '13

03 Jan '13

Comment #3 on issue 316 by liskni.si: AvoidStruts gives wrong window heights with vertically stacked screens http://code.google.com/p/xmonad/issues/detail?id=316 http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/xmonad/2009-November/009145.html This, I believe, fixed the issue and discusses why it changes the strut semantics incompatibly with wm-spec. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings

1 2

Re: Issue 240 in xmonad: recompilation fails silently
by codesite-noreply＠google.com 31 Dec '12

31 Dec '12

Updates: Status: Patch Owner: SpencerJanssen Comment #3 on issue 240 by vogt.adam: recompilation fails silently http://code.google.com/p/xmonad/issues/detail?id=240 Attached is a patch to accomplish the same indirectly by checking that the target executable is actually updated. But given that we have enough trouble to include the code for popping up an xmessage to welcome new users, then this patch might not be worth including since it addresses a rarer issue with somewhat more code. Attachments: check-that-the-expected-xmonad__arch__os-is-actually-updated_.dpatch 12.1 KB -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings

1 2

Re: Issue 211 in xmonad: Error output inconsistency
by codesite-noreply＠google.com 31 Dec '12

31 Dec '12

Comment #1 on issue 211 by byorgey: Error output inconsistency http://code.google.com/p/xmonad/issues/detail?id=211 Status? This seems like a pretty simple change, do other developers have an opinion on this? -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings

1 1

Issue 360 in xmonad: shellPromptHere from XMonad.Actions.SpawnOn freezes upon files with Chinese names
by codesite-noreply＠google.com 15 Dec '12

15 Dec '12

Status: New Owner: ---- New issue 360 by wei.hoo: shellPromptHere from XMonad.Actions.SpawnOn freezes upon files with Chinese names http://code.google.com/p/xmonad/issues/detail?id=360 What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Bind a key combination to shellPromptHere 2. mkdir /tmp/new; cd /tmp/new 3. touch 1; touch 测试 4. Invoke shellPromptHere, type in "emacs /tmp/new/", press TAB What is the expected output? What do you see instead? Observe that the shell prompt window freezes. No keybindings are accepted, such as C-a, C-e, C-g. However, XMonad keybindings are still effective. At this point we have to press M-q to restart XMonad. What version of the product are you using? On what operating system? xmonad-darcs and xmona-contrib-darcs on Arch Linux. GHC-6.12. Are you using an xmonad.hs? Please attach it and the output of "xmonad --recompile". Please provide any additional information below. If we remove /tmp/new/1 and only keep /tmp/new/测试, typing "emacs /tmp/new/ [TAB]" doesn't freeze the shell prompt. The Chinese-named file isn't shown in the completion, but we can still press C-g to cancel the shell prompt. The font I'm using does support Chinese. PS: I kind of remember this wasn't a problem with ghc-6.10, but I'm not sure. Attachments: xmonad.hs 6.8 KB -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings

1 1

Re: Issue 177 in xmonad: xmonad does not follow ICCCM and ignores WM_TAKE_FOCUS protocol
by codesite-noreply＠google.com 04 Dec '12

04 Dec '12

Comment #24 on issue 177 by vogt.adam: xmonad does not follow ICCCM and ignores WM_TAKE_FOCUS protocol http://code.google.com/p/xmonad/issues/detail?id=177 Geoff Reedy's last patch doesn't apply cleanly against latest darcs (due to the merging of extensible state stuff). Attached is a patch bundle including the old ones that probably works as the old one did. Attachments: track-currently-processing-event.dpatch 16.1 KB -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings

4 108

Issue 346 in xmonad: xmonad will not render dialog windows.
by codesite-noreply＠google.com 09 Sep '12

09 Sep '12

Status: New Owner: ---- New issue 346 by Monkey.Andrew: xmonad will not render dialog windows. http://code.google.com/p/xmonad/issues/detail?id=346 What steps will reproduce the problem? Opening (so far) any gtk application's open dialog (file > open), and the dialog will not render, as if it were an invisible window. The proof of its existence lies in how it steals focus from its parent window and how the cursor changes when on top of it. When I move the dialog window, it appears and I can interact with it normally from there on out. This has happened with chromium, firefox, openoffice, and gvbam. What is the expected output? What do you see instead? See above. What version of the product are you using? On what operating system? 0.9 on archlinux Are you using an xmonad.hs? Please attach it and the output of "xmonad --recompile". main=do xmonad $ defaultConfig { terminal ="urxvt -bg black -fg white +sb -tr -sh 50" , modMask =mod4Mask , borderWidth=3 Please provide any additional information below. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings

1 15

Issue 380 in xmonad: Infer shiftMask given keysyms that otherwise will not be received
by codesite-noreply＠google.com 15 Aug '12

15 Aug '12

Status: Accepted Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Low New issue 380 by vogt.adam: Infer shiftMask given keysyms that otherwise will not be received http://code.google.com/p/xmonad/issues/detail?id=380 What steps will reproduce the problem? A keybinding to (0, xK_plus) doesn't work What is the expected output? What do you see instead? Instead you have to bind to: (shiftMask, xK_equal) Maybe doing this correctly regardless of the keymap isn't possible, but perhaps a reasonable approximation can be done like this: * if the keymap contains 'unreachable keys' like "M-+", grab "M-+" and "M-S-=" * if we actually get a "M-+", ungrab the "M-S-=", and run the normal action for "M-+" This can be done with a handleEventHook outside of core, but for users, the current workaround is probably easier having an optional handleEventHook to EZConfig (note how uncommon the use of the optional startupHook from that module is). -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings

1 1