February 2011 - arch-haskell

AUR Comment for life
by simons＠cryp.to 18 Feb '11

18 Feb '11

from http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34006 pdxleif wrote: The PKGBUILDs in HABS build and work fine for me (on x86_64). The binaries on [haskell] just need to be rebuilt (if that's what people are using), it seems. --- If you no longer wish to receive notifications about this package, please go the the above package page and click the UnNotify button.

1 0

Further to the discussion in pull request for yi
by Magnus Therning 18 Feb '11

18 Feb '11

We've had a discussion in the pull request including yi[1] about our tool-chain. I thought it'd be better to continue it here. Peter, What do changes do you propose we make to our tool chain to support patching of packages? /M [1]: https://github.com/archhaskell/habs/issues/closed#issue/32 -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: magnus(a)therning.org jabber: magnus(a)therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus

2 4

AUR Comment for life
by simons＠cryp.to 18 Feb '11

18 Feb '11

from http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34006 magus wrote: Dependencies on wrong versions is most likely due to cabal2arch having the wrong versions in its data files. I'll hopefully have time to look into that during the weekend, if no one beats me to it. --- If you no longer wish to receive notifications about this package, please go the the above package page and click the UnNotify button.

1 0

AUR Comment for life
by simons＠cryp.to 18 Feb '11

18 Feb '11

from http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34006 pdxleif wrote: Any pacman front-end should be fine these days. Are you using the AUR PKGBUILDS or the HABS [haskell] repo? It seems the haskell-glut and haskell-opengl in the repo need to be rebuilt. haskell-glut depends on an incorrect version of haskell-array, and haskell-opengl depends on a different version of base. --- If you no longer wish to receive notifications about this package, please go the the above package page and click the UnNotify button.

1 0

AUR Comment for life
by simons＠cryp.to 18 Feb '11

18 Feb '11

from http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34006 peti wrote: Hi Cephalopoid, the 'haskell-array' package is provided by the compiler, extra/ghc, so that dependency shouldn't be missing. Are you using a pacman front-end that understands the 'provides' field in PKGBUILD files, like bauerbill? --- If you no longer wish to receive notifications about this package, please go the the above package page and click the UnNotify button.

1 0

AUR Comment for life
by simons＠cryp.to 18 Feb '11

18 Feb '11

from http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34006 cephalopoid wrote: It says "Dependency 'haskell-array' of 'life' does not exist." Can you fix it? --- If you no longer wish to receive notifications about this package, please go the the above package page and click the UnNotify button.

1 0

AUR Out-of-date Notification for life
by simons＠cryp.to 18 Feb '11

18 Feb '11

Your package life has been flagged out of date by cephalopoid [1]. You may view your package at: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34006 [1] - http://aur.archlinux.org/account.php?Action=AccountInfo&ID=16543

1 0

fixes to the DBus package
by Rémy Oudompheng 15 Feb '11

15 Feb '11

Hello, Here are several fixes for the DBus package in order to build correctly with GHC 7 and declare pkg-config dependencies correctly. Can someone review this patch and assert I did not break anything ? I'd like this patch to end up in the official package, I added David Himmelstrup to the recipient list Rémy.

2 1

Symlinks are screwed up in i686
by Peter Simons 15 Feb '11

15 Feb '11

Magnus, your recent update of the i686 tree screwed up the symlinks for 'repo.db' again, which in turn broke my build. Furthermore, you've again deleted older versions of the updated packages even though I repeatedly asked you not to. This is the third or fourth time that this is happening -- despite the fact that you should know better. It's beginning to look like your breaking the i686 repository for use with my build scripts on purpose. Peter

3 5

Re: [arch-haskell] Preparing for the release
by Magnus Therning 13 Feb '11

13 Feb '11

On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 05:32:39AM +0100, Mikhail Glushenkov wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Magnus Therning <magnus(a)therning.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 03:11:37PM -0800, Don Stewart wrote: > >> Thanks Christian! > >> > >> Yes, we will go to parsec-3: the maintainer has declared that is the > >> appropriate steps for parsec: > >> > >> http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/2010-November/015047.html > >> > >> Getting containers updated for 7.0.2 would also be nice. > > > > Any comments on my concerns on OpenGL and GLUT? > > I think we should be fine, since the same versions of GLUT and > OpenGL were shipped with 2010.2.0. Well, if "fine" means 2011.2.0.0 will be broken in the same way as 2010.2.0 is broken, then yes, we'll be fine :-) Anyway, it seems that is indeed what'll happen. Fingers crossed that it's fixed for 2011.4.0.0. /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: magnus(a)therning.org jabber: magnus(a)therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus I invented the term Object-Oriented, and I can tell you I did not have C++ in mind. -- Alan Kay

2 1