- ghc-devs - Haskell.org

Welcome to GitLab!
by Ben Gamari 07 Jan '19

07 Jan '19

TL;DR. https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc.git is now the official upstream GHC repository. Various introductory notes are discussed. Let me know if you have any trouble. Also, please do verify the correctness of the email address associated with your Trac account in the next few weeks. It will be used to map users when we transition Trac tickets to GitLab. Hello everyone, I am happy to announce that CI on GHC's GitLab instance [1] is now stable. At this point https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc.git is to be considered the official upstream repository of GHC. The rest of this email is meant to serve as a brief introduction and status update. It can also be viewed on the GitLab Wiki [2]. [1] https://gitlab.haskell.org/ [2] https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/wikis/welcome # Getting started To get started on GitLab you will first want to either create a new account [1] or login with your GitHub credentials [2]. Once you have an account you should add an SSH key [3] so that you can push to your repositories. If you currently have commit rights to GHC notify me (Ben Gamari) of your user name so I can grant you similar rights in GitLab. [1] https://gitlab.haskell.org/users/sign_in [2] https://gitlab.haskell.org/users/auth/github [3] https://gitlab.haskell.org/profile/keys # Updating your development environment You can updated existing working directory (assuming the usual upstream remote name of `origin`) for the new upstream repository location by running the following: git remote set-url origin https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc.git git remote set-url --push origin git@gitlab.haskell.org:ghc/ghc This is all that should be necessary; a quick `git pull origin master` should verify that everything is working as expected. # Continuous integration Continuous integration is now provided by GitLab's native continuous integration infrastructure. We currently test a variety of configurations, including many that neither Phabricator nor CircleCI/Appveyor previously tested (see [1] for an example run): * With the make build system: * x86_64/Linux on Fedora 27, Debian 8, and Debian 9 * i386/Linux on Debian 9 * aarch64/Linux on Debian 9 (currently broken due to a variety of issues) * x86_64/Windows * x86_64/Darwin * x86_64/Linux on Debian 9 in a few special configurations: * unregisterised (still a bit fragile due to #16085) * integer-simple * building GHC with -fllvm * With Hadrian: * x86_64/Linux on Debian 9 * x86_64/Windows (currently broken due to #15950) We also run a slightly larger set of jobs on a nightly basis. Note that binary distributions are saved from most builds and are available for download for a few weeks (we may put in place a longer retention policy for some builds in the future). There are admittedly a few kinks that we are still working out, particularly in the case of Windows (specifically the long build times seen on Windows). If you suspect you are seeing spurious build failures do let us know. To make the best use of our limited computational resources our CI builds occur in three stages: * lint: the style and correctness checkers which would previously be run by `arc lint` and `git push` * build: Debian 9 Linux x86_64 built with make and Hadrian * full-build: the remaining configurations If a build fails at an earlier phase no further phases will be run. [1] https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/pipelines/568 # Structuring your merge request With the transition to GitLab GHC is moving to a model similar to that used by GitHub. If you have a Differential on Phabricator we will finish review there. However, please post new patches as merge requests on GitLab. Note that Phabricator and GitLab have quite different models for handling patches. Under Phabricator a Differential is a single patch with no further structure; larger changes can be composed of multiple dependent Differentials. Under GitLab's model a merge request is a git branch consisting of one or more patches. Larger changes can be handled in one of two ways: a. a set of dependent merge requests, each of which to be squashed when merged. b. a single branch with each atomic change made in a single, buildable commit Due to the difficulty of maintaining dependent merge requests, I would recommend that contributors making larger changes use method (b). # Submitting your merge request for review Depending upon whether you have push rights to the GHC repository there are two ways to submit a merge request: * if you have push access you can push a branch directly to git@gitlab.haskell.org:ghc/ghc.git and open merge request. In this case please do follow the usual branch naming conventions: * prefix all branch names with `wip/` * if you are fixing a particular ticket consider using the name `wip/TNNNN` * if not you can create a fork using the "Fork" button on the project page [1] and push your branch there In either case after you have pushed your branch open a merge request against ghc/ghc [2]. [1] https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/forks/new [2] https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/merge_requests/new # Reviewing and merging merge requests As always, all contributors are encouraged to help review proposed changes. If you are unfamiliar with GitLab's review interface please see GitLab's user documentation [1]. Here are a few quick highlights for those who are familiar with GitHub but haven't yet used GitLab: * As with GitHub, GitLab supports both inline and out-of-line comments. * Comments that are actionable (known as "discussions") can be marked as resolved and collapsed. * Comments can be left on both changed and unchanged lines * Revisions of a merge request can be viewed and compared using the two drop-down menus at the top of the Changes tab * Merge requests can require approvals from particular users before considered as mergable * Merge requests can be placed in "merge when CI passes" state, which will cause merge requests to be merged as soon as they are green From this point onward all changes to GHC will be merged via GitLab's merge requests facility and must pass CI before being merged. To ensure that GHC's git history remains linear ghc/ghc will use GitLab's "fast-forward without a merge commit" merge strategy. Consequently you will be asked to rebase merge requests which are not fast-forward merges before merging (a convenient "Rebase" button will appear if the rebase can be carried out without conflicts. [1] https://gitlab.com/help/user/discussions/index.md#discussions # Status of the Trac migration Tobias will be continuing work on the Trac ticket migration after a bit of a holiday break. Hopefully by mid-January we will be able to move forward on this part of the migration; I will share more details about this as they develop. In the meantime, users of Trac should check and possibly update the email address associated with their account [1]. This address will be used to correlate Trac users with their GitLab equivalents so the correctness of this address will be important in preserving attribution information during the Trac import. [1] https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/prefs # Next steps We are actively working on cleaning up a few remaining issues with CI: * build times are still very long on Windows, despite the fact that we are only building the `quick` build flavour on that platform; consequently GitLab CI Windows builds do sometimes timeout when we are faced with long build queues. * we at times run low on disk space on our Windows builder runners, resulting in occasional spurious build failures * Appveyor builds (which are supposed to supplement the native GitLab builds) rarely seem to finish GitLab upstream has been incredibly supportive of our transition effort and has expressed interest in assisting us with issues that we encounter. Our current requests can be found on our migration effort's tracking ticket [1]. If you find any additional bugs or workflows that could be improved please do let me know and I can raise the matter with GitLab. [1] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/55039 # Acknowledgments I would like to acknowledge several parties for their contributions to this effort: * Packet.net and Google X for their generous donation of hosting for continuous integration and web hosting * GitLab and their Open Source program for many productive discussions, their generous support, and the GitLab Ultimate license used by gitlab.haskell.org. * Davean Scies for his help procuring the hosting services that power our continuous integration. * Tweag.io for their offer of help and advice * Matthew Pickering, Alp Mestangullari, Tobias Dammers for their work in setting up the new instance, sorting out the details of the migration, and debugging problems when they arose Finally, thanks to GHC's contributors for their patience during this transition; it has been a long process which has stolen a significant amount of attention from other matters. My apologies we have been a bit less responsive than usual in code review and ticket triage over the past month or two. Regardless, I am hopeful that this wait will be worthwhile. # Final thoughts This is not only a milestone for the GitLab migration but also for GHC itself. For the first time GHC has fully-automated testing, proposed patch CI, and release generation across the full range of Tier 1 configurations it supports, with passing builds in all cases. We are very excited to begin this next chapter of GHC's development and are looking forward to your feedback on how we can further improve our new infrastructure. Onward and upwards! Cheers, - Ben

9 18

FYI panic "flatten_args wandered into deeper water than usual"
by Nicolas Frisby 07 Jan '19

07 Jan '19

While developing a typechecker plugin, I experienced this error message. > ghc: panic! (the 'impossible' happened) > (GHC version 8.6.2 for x86_64-unknown-linux): > flatten_args wandered into deeper water than usual > Call stack: > CallStack (from HasCallStack): > callStackDoc, called at compiler/utils/Outputable.hs:1160:37 in ghc:Outputable > pprPanic, called at compiler/typecheck/TcFlatten.hs:1331:24 in ghc:TcFlatten > > Please report this as a GHC bug: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/reportabug I'm sending this email just in case a dev is curious how this panic arises or if another plugin developer sees the same thing -- the error message is not very informative, and the corresponding GHC source code is a bit obtuse. Based on the relevant GHC source code and my recent plugin edits, I was able to guess correctly that this was due to me generating an extra sort argument to a promoted datacon. Specifically, I was incorrectly using > mkTyConApp (promoteDataCon _) [typeKind k,k,...] instead of just > mkTyConApp (promoteDataCon _) [k,...] Thanks! HTH. -Nick

2 1

Building dictionary terms in Core?
by Ömer Sinan Ağacan 07 Jan '19

07 Jan '19

Hi, In #15646 (recent discussion in Gitlab MR 55) we need dictionary arguments in Core (in desugarer) to apply to functions like `fromRational :: Fractional a => Rational -> a`, but we don't know how to build the dictionary term (`Fractional a`) in Core. Can anyone who know help us in the MR? Thanks, Ömer

3 2

How to use Data.Compact.Serialize
by Christopher Done 07 Jan '19

07 Jan '19

Hi, On the docs for Data.Compact.Serialize it says: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/compact-0.1.0.1/docs/Data-Compact-Serial… > Our binary representation contains direct pointers to the info tables > of objects in the region. This means that the info tables of the > receiving process must be laid out in exactly the same way as from the > original process; in practice, this means using static linking, using > the exact same binary and turning off ASLR. It seems to me that in order to use this module in any practical way (i.e. write to file from one process, and then a later run of the process reads it), you need to know a special way to build your binary which isn't fully described here. What flags, for example, should be passed to GHC to make this viable? * Turning off ASLR on Linux is done by writing 0 to /proc/sys/kernel/randomize_va_space, which applies to all programs. That's not the most isolated way to deploy an app, but I discovered that you can set this per process here: https://askubuntu.com/a/507954 * To compile GHC programs statically, use -optl-static -optl-pthread. So in total the example would be: $ stack build compact compact-0.1.0.1: download compact-0.1.0.1: configure compact-0.1.0.1: build compact-0.1.0.1: copy/register Example file from docs: $ cat main.hs {-# LANGUAGE TypeApplications #-} import System.Environment import Data.Compact import Data.Compact.Serialize main = do arg:_ <- getArgs case arg of "write" -> do orig_c <- compact ("I want to serialize this", True) writeCompact @(String, Bool) "somefile" orig_c "read" -> do res <- unsafeReadCompact @(String, Bool) "somefile" case res of Left err -> fail err Right c -> print (getCompact c) Compiling statically: $ stack ghc -- -optl-static -optl-pthread main.hs [1 of 1] Compiling Main ( main.hs, main.o ) Linking main ... [...hundred more warnings like this ...] Check that it's static: $ ldd main not a dynamic executable Write the file: $ setarch `uname -m` -R ./main write Read the file: $ setarch `uname -m` -R ./main read ("I want to serialize this",True) Can a GHC dev confirm that this is the proper way to do this? If so, I'll contribute this little example as documentation to the compact package. Cheers

3 3

GitLab CI for patches across submodules
by Simon Jakobi 06 Jan '19

06 Jan '19

Hi, I just tried to use GitLab CI to validate a GHC patch including changes to Haddock: https://gitlab.haskell.org/sjakobi/ghc/pipelines/842 The problem is that the CI script tries to find my Haddock commit at https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/haddock. But that repo doesn't even allow merge request. Should the submodule origin for util/haddock maybe point at https://github.com/haskell/haddock instead? Cheers, Simon

2 2

RE: Glasgow Haskell Compiler | Fix #16133 by checking for TypeApplications in rnExpr (!77)
by Simon Peyton Jones 06 Jan '19

06 Jan '19

I am now getting lots of email from GitLab, and I’m trying to figure out what they all mean. They come in various forms. Here’s one puzzler: * what does the email below mean? Is it a new merge request? * what is the “!77”? * What does “RyanGlScott/ghc:wip/T16133 → ghc/ghc:master” mean? Simon From: Ryan Scott <gitlab(a)gitlab.haskell.org> Sent: 05 January 2019 17:46 To: Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj(a)microsoft.com> Subject: Glasgow Haskell Compiler | Fix #16133 by checking for TypeApplications in rnExpr (!77) Project:Branches: RyanGlScott/ghc:wip/T16133 → ghc/ghc:master We had a validity check, typeAppErr, for visible kind applications (in rnHsTyKi), but didn't extend the same treatment to visible type applications (in rnExpr). Easily fixed by also invoking typeAppErr from rnExpr. Fixes https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/16133<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fghc.haske…>. — View it on GitLab<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitlab.ha…>. You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.haskell.org. If you'd like to receive fewer emails, you can unsubscribe<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitlab.ha…> from this thread or adjust your notification settings.

2 1

Failure to catch C++ exception in Haskell on OS X
by Bas van Dijk 05 Jan '19

05 Jan '19

Dear GHC Devs, I'm debugging an issue in our haskell-opencv library where a C++ exception that is thrown by the OpenCV C++ library isn't caught by the C++ try...catch block we have inlined in our Haskell code using inline-c-cpp. This results in the process terminating by SIGABRT. Note that this only happens on OS X. In Linux the exception is caught correctly. I wrote a minimal isolated test case (which doesn't use OpenCV) at: https://github.com/basvandijk/darwin-cxx-exception-bug I wrote some instructions in the README on how to reproduce this and included some debugging notes. I'm not sure the bug is caused by a mis-configuration in my code or if it's a bug in nixpkgs, Cabal or GHC. Any idea what could be causing this? Bas

4 5

Status of downloads.haskell.org/~ghc/master/
by Artem Pelenitsyn 05 Jan '19

05 Jan '19

Hello devs, What is the status of this directory [1]? It doesn't seem to be the tip of the master branch in the repo. In the documentation [2] it says: > GHC 8.5.20180424 User's Guide I'm asking because it has broken links to the base haddocks in it (here [3] try clicking on any link to the library docs, e.g. GHC.Conc.par), and Google happily indexes and spits out as results of search queries everything laying here and there, including these pages. Broken links could lead “outsiders” to a somewhat underwhelming impression of the state of infrastructure. [1]: http://downloads.haskell.org/~ghc/master/ [2]: http://downloads.haskell.org/~ghc/master/users-guide/index.html [3]: http://downloads.haskell.org/~ghc/master/users-guide/runtime_control.html#r… -- Best wishes, Artem

2 1

GitLab cross-posting to Trac?
by Richard Eisenberg 05 Jan '19

05 Jan '19

Hi devs, With our new GitLab workflow, will commit messages still be posted to Issues (once the migration is complete)? That's been really useful with Trac. Thanks, Richard

5 8

The GHC Proposals Process
by Ara Adkins 04 Jan '19

04 Jan '19

Hey All, Now we have our own git instance in GitLab, are there any plans to move the proposals process from GitHub? _ara

3 3